At Sheringham situated on the North Norfolk Coast in England UK - Our community newspaper online.
@ Sheringham Community Paper Issue No 25 - Friday 17th October 2003 - Choose another issue »
Page index » | P1 | P2 | P3 | P4 | P5 | P6 | P7 | P8 | P9 | P10 | P11 | P12 | P13 | P14 | P15 | P16 |

WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE PROM?

''Dowdy!'' ''Grubby!'' '' Needs to be tidied up!'' were among the responses to a recent survey of local people's opinions of the promenade in Sheringham. Most particularly remarked upon was the East End. 44% expressed dissatisfaction with the general appearance of the promenade, and a further 12% even rated it as highly unsatisfactory! Some held a more positive view - just 25% of respondents deemed it to be satisfactory, but 16% viewed the prom as highly satisfactory.

The vast majority was content with access to the prom itself, although only 50% considered access to the beach to be sufficient. A recurring comment was the poor provision for the less able-bodied, many elderly and disabled people remarked that they would dearly love to access the beach but cannot, or that they are able to ''get down but not up'' as the few slopes in existence are too steep. Ramps would be welcomed, in fact any alternative to the ''worn slippery steps'' at present. Other suggestions included rush mats across the stones for pushchairs and wheelchairs (just like the olden days) or even a chairlift down the cliff to the beach. This was echoed by 'non-locals' responding to the same survey, 50% of whom were satisfied with access to the beach on a personal level, whilst pointing out that others would find it much more difficult. A clear picture emerged regarding facilities on the promenade 66% of locals considered the toilets to be inadequate, there are no toilets on the promenade itself, and 50% of all non-locals agreed. Whilst just over 50% of locals questioned thought the general level of cleanliness on the prom to be satisfactory, 66% felt strongly that more litter bins are needed along with more frequent emptying of bins, more bins for 'dog litter' and closed bins, it seems that this would help with vermin control, also suggested by many. Opinions were divided over facilities for children, 33% said that these are adequate at present after all, the whole beach is a playground, but another 33% felt that more is needed, perhaps a playpark / fun area for when the tide is in? Donkeys were also suggested, along with better facilities in general such as showers, changing areas/bathing tents or colourful Beach Huts.

It seems that nearly 50% of all locals questioned had 'no opinion' on the provision of lighting at night, largely because they consider it to be an unsafe place to go after dark. Only 10% of tourists were satisfied with the lighting 'Whatever happened to all the pretty lights?' commented one couple. 66% of locals felt that seating is satisfactory on the prom, in fact many commented that more seats would only invite more vandalism. This prompted suggestions for more police patrol, CCTV cameras, and more frequent beach inspector visits. However 66% of non-locals replied that more seating is needed, how about a seating area, with old-fashioned deckchairs? A strong need was expressed too for more safety vigilance and public awareness, in the form of more lifeguard posts and bigger signs forbidding cycling and skateboarding. "Too much concrete!" was another much expressed criticism. Some landscaping and an attempt to "get rid of the weeds", would be welcomed. Beyond this, opinions were somewhat divided. Locals thought that children's amusements and beachside cafes would be a valuable addition. Some tourists expressed a need for more places to eat near the beach, especially after 5pm, but 70% voiced positive satisfaction with the status quo. Many view Sheringham and its prom as a 'typical old-fashioned seaside town', to which 'nothing commercial' should be added. 60% of non-locals held a satisfied first impression of the prom, and another 20% were even highly satisfied, a noticeably stark contrast to local opinion. This survey certainly reveals a need for more facilities and improvements in appearance on the prom, but these must be sensitively handled to preserve Sheringham's character and avoid over commercialisation, a delicate and challenging balancing act indeed. Anna Clayton
Sheringham Community Paper Teen+ Scene

YOUR Column
YOUR interests.


This is an easy one if you think about it.

What unusual property do the words FLOUR, TERN, and THIRSTY have in common?



Sheringham Community Paper

Sheringham Community Paper
Published by Norfolk A2Z. 14, Waterbank House, Station Approach, Sheringham, Norfolk. NR26 8RA
Tel: 01263 826005  Fax: 01263 823235  website: www.at-sheringham.co.uk   e-mail: info@at-sheringham.co.uk